Earthquake‑Prone Building Changes in New Zealand Explained: What Home and Small Building Owners Need to Know

Major reforms to New Zealand’s Earthquake Prone Building (EPB) system are underway, shifting from a %NBS based framework to a targeted, risk-based methodology. The changes will significantly reduce compliance requirements for many buildings while focusing resources on those posing the highest life safety risk.

First, what is EPB and %NBS?

An earthquake-prone building (EPB) is a building that is considered likely to suffer serious damage or collapse in a moderate earthquake, in a way that could cause injury or death. In the past, being labelled an EPB often meant legal timeframes to strengthen the building.

%NBS (Percentage of New Building Standard) compares how a building is expected to perform in an earthquake against today’s building standards for a new building. A lower %NBS does not automatically mean a building is high life safety risk, but it has traditionally been used to decide whether a building was classed as earthquake prone.

Why the EPB system is changing

The current EPB system has captured many buildings that pose low actual risk, while creating:

  • High strengthening costs

  • Insurance and lending challenges

  • Stress and uncertainty for owners

The new approach aims to:

  • Focus on life safety risk, not theoretical engineering scores

  • Target known high risk building types

  • Make strengthening simpler and more affordable

  • Remove low risk buildings from the system altogether

The biggest change: fewer buildings in the EPB system

Under the new methodology, two building types will qualify as earthquake prone:

  • Unreinforced masonry (URM) buildings (typically older brick or stone buildings with little or no steel reinforcement)

  • Pre modern code concrete buildings that are three storeys or taller

All other buildings (including many previously listed due to low %NBS ratings) will be removed from the EPB register.

What’s changing by region

These changes also reflect where earthquakes are more (or less) likely to occur.

  • Auckland and Northland will no longer have earthquake prone buildings under the new system, due to lower seismic hazard.

  • Coastal Otago and Southland move into a medium seismic zone, meaning the updated methodology will apply there.

For many owners, this means no more EPB label at all.

%NBS is being removed from EPB regulations

Another major shift is that %NBS will no longer be used to define whether a building is an EPB.

Instead, engineers will identify specific, visible high risk structural features, such as:

  • Parapets and façades

  • Heavy appendages

  • Known brittle concrete failure mechanisms

Importantly, %NBS assessments will still exist outside the EPB framework and will continue to be used for:

  • Due diligence

  • Asset valuation

  • Insurance discussions

  • Transaction decision making

Lower-cost and more targeted strengthening

Where strengthening is required, the new system focuses on fixing the parts of a building that pose a real danger, rather than upgrading everything.

Examples include:

  • URM façade securing, which could reduce strengthening costs by up to 80%

  • Concrete buildings needing work only on high risk elements

  • Use of standard or template solutions instead of one off designs

This means:

  • Less disruption

  • Lower cost

  • Better safety outcomes

Easier renovations and changes of use

Under the new rules:

  • Doing seismic work won’t automatically trigger fire or accessibility upgrades

  • Changing how a building is used will be simpler and cheaper

This removes a major barrier that has stopped many owners from improving or repurposing older buildings.

Health and safety responsibilities clarified

The reforms also clarify obligations under the Health and Safety at Work Act.

In simple terms:

  • If a building is an EPB and the owner is meeting their Building Act duties, the owner or tenant has no extra seismic duty

  • If a building is not an EPB, no action is required under this section

This provides welcome certainty for both owners and tenants.

What this means for most home and small building owners

For many people, the outcome is very positive:

If your building is not URM

And it is not an older concrete building over three storeys

There will be no mandatory legal strengthening under the EPB system

However:

  • Engineering assessments for buying, selling, or alterations will still be common

  • Understanding your building’s real risk remains important

While the EPB system is changing, engineering due diligence is not going away.

BCD Group can help property owners, investors, and developers:

  • Interpret whether the new EPB methodology applies to your building

  • Identify high risk structural features

  • Provide engineering assessments for sale, purchase, or alteration

  • Develop targeted, cost effective strengthening solutions where required

If you own, manage, or are considering purchasing an older commercial or heritage building, now is the time to understand how these reforms affect your investment.

Get in touch with our Structural Engineering Team for project specific advice.


References:

https://www.mbie.govt.nz/dmsdocument/31204-earthquake-prone-building-system-and-seismic-risk-management-review-proactiverelease-pdf

https://www.mbie.govt.nz/about/news/earthquake-prone-building-system-changes-announced

https://www.building.govt.nz/about-building-performance/all-news-and-updates/earthquake-prone-building-system-review-announced


Note: This article aims to provide general guidance and should not replace professional advice specific to your project or situation. For professional advice, please contact our team today.

Next
Next

Granny Flat Legislation Update – What You Need to Know (2026)